CHAP. 4.—HOW OFTEN AND ON WHAT OCCASIONS CORN HAS SOLD AT A REMARKABLY LOW PRICE.
The consequence was, that when the Roman manners were
such as these, the corn that Italy produced was sufficient for
its wants, and it had to be indebted to no province for its
food; and not only this, but the price of provisions was incredibly cheap. Manius Marcius, the ædile[1] of the people,
was the first who gave corn to the people at the price of one
as for the modius. L. Minutius Augurinus,[2] the same who
detected, when eleventh tribune of the people, the projects of
Spurius Mælius, reduced the price of corn on three market
days,[3] to one as per modius; for which reason a statue was
erected in honour of him, by public subscription, without the
Trigeminian Gate.[4] T. Seius distributed corn to the people,
in his ædileship,[5] at one as per modius, in remembrance of
which statues were erected in honour of him also in the Capitol and the Palatium: on the day of his funeral he was borne to
the pile on the shoulders of the Roman people. In the year,[6]
too, in which the Mother of the Gods was brought to Rome, the
harvest of that summer, it is said, was more abundant than it
had been for ten years before. M. Yarro informs us, that in the
year[7] in which L. Metellus exhibited so many elephants in
his triumphal procession, a modius of spelt was sold for one as,
which was the standard price also of a congius of wine, thirty
pounds' weight of dried figs, ten pounds of olive oil, and
twelve pounds of flesh meat. Nor did this cheapness originate
in the wide-spread domains of individuals encroaching continually upon their neighbours, for by a law proposed by Licinius Stolo, the landed property of each individual was limited
to five hundred jugera; and he himself was convicted under
his own law of being the owner of more than that amount,
having as a disguise prevailed upon his son to lend him his
name. Such were the prices of commodities at a time when
the fortunes of the republic were rapidly on the increase. The
words, too, that were uttered by Manius Curius[8] after his
triumphs and the addition of an immense extent of territory
to the Roman sway, are well known: "The man must be
looked upon," said he, "as a dangerous citizen, for whom
seven jugera of land are not enough;" such being the amount
of land that had been allotted to the people after the expulsion
of the kings.
What, then, was the cause of a fertility so remarkable as
this? The fact, we have every reason to believe, that in
those days the lands were tilled by the hands of generals
even, the soil exulting beneath a plough-share crowned with
wreaths of laurel, and guided by a husbandman graced with
triumphs: whether it is that they tended the seed with the
same care that they had displayed in the conduct of wars, and
manifested the same diligent attention in the management of
their fields that they had done in the arrangement of the camp,
or whether it is that under the hands of honest men everything prospers all the better, from being attended to with a
scrupulous exactness. The honours awarded to Serranus[9]
found him engaged in sowing his fields, a circumstance to
which he owes his surname.[10] Cincinnatus was ploughing his
four jugera of land upon the Vaticanian Hill—the same that are
still known as the "Quintian Meadows,"[11] when the messenger brought him the dictatorship—finding him, the tradition says, stripped to the work, and his very face begrimed
with dust. "Put on your clothes," said he, "that I may deliver to you the mandates of the senate and people of Rome."
In those days these messengers bore the name of "viator," or
"wayfarer," from the circumstance that their usual employ-
ment was to fetch the senators and generals from their fields.
But at the present day these same lands are tilled by slaves
whose legs are in chains, by the hands of malefactors and men
with a branded face! And yet the Earth is not deaf to our
adjurations, when we address her by the name of "parent,"
and say that she receives our homage[12] in being tilled by
hands such as these; as though, forsooth, we ought not to believe that she is reluctant and indignant at being tended in
such a manner as this! Indeed, ought we to feel any surprise
were the recompense she gives us when worked by chastised
slaves,[13] not the same that she used to bestow upon the labours
of warriors?